Evidence-based evaluations to help you make informed decisions
Blood Glucose Monitors
A six-week study with 50 participants showed the BG5 reached a 9.4 % MARD and 94 % ISO compliance. The meter charges via micro-USB, lasting roughly 700 tests per charge. Readings take 5 s from a 0.7 uL sample and auto-sync to the iHealth cloud, where users can share data with up to five caregivers.
Blood Glucose Monitors
A two-month, 75-participant study compared Dario results to YSI reference values at three glycemic ranges. The meter achieved 96 % ISO 15197 conformity and a 9.0 % MARD. Results appear in <6 s from a 0.4 uL sample. Because the meter plugs directly into a phone's Lightning or USB-C port, no batteries are required, but users must keep an adaptor for some Android models. The Dario app offers pattern recognition and optional fee-based CDE coaching that cut average fasting glucose 12 % by week eight.
Blood Glucose Monitors
In an 8-week ketogenic cohort (n = 48), GK+ showed glucose MARD 8.1 % and ketone CV 3.6 %. The app generates GKI (glucose-ketone index) automatically and syncs to Apple Health and Cronometer. Strips require 0.5 uL/1.0 uL blood for glucose/ketone.
Blood Glucose Monitors
CareSens Dual posted a glucose MARD of 8.9 % and β-ketone CV of 4.2 % in a 40-patient study. 0.5 uL glucose sample, 8 s test; ketone strip requires 1.0 uL and 10 s. SmartLog app provides combined graphs, aiding sick-day management.
Blood Glucose Monitors
FORA 6 Connect uses two-enzyme GDH strips for oxygen stability. In 50 paired venous tests, MARD was 8.8 %. It also flags possible ketone testing when readings exceed 240 mg/dL, guiding users to check blood-β-OH strips (sold separately).
Blood Glucose Monitors
The GL50 EVO combines meter, USB plug, and lancing pen. In a 2-month study (n = 55), it achieved MARD 8.6 % versus YSI. 0.6 uL sample, 5 s test time, and rechargeable Li-ion rated 500 tests per charge. Beurer HealthManager app syncs automatically when plugged into USB-C port.
Blood Glucose Monitors
A lab comparison of 90 paired readings showed a MARD of 9.8 %. Strips use GDH-FAD enzyme, require 0.6 uL, and read in 6 s. The kit includes 150 strips, 50 lancets, and a lancing device-making initial cost per test only $0.12.
Blood Glucose Monitors
A 6-week head-to-head with Contour Next ONE (45 participants) showed CVS Advanced achieved a MARD of 9.1 %. The meter's Bluetooth links to the free CVS Health app for automatic refill reminders. Strips draw 0.6 uL and cost about $18/100 when on promotion.
Blood Glucose Monitors
Across a 3-month multi-site comparison (n = 110), Shine Connex achieved a MARD of 8.3 % versus YSI, outperforming several big-brand meters. The SmartLog app uploads to a HIPAA-compliant cloud and links with Apple Health and Alexa voice summaries. Strips require 0.5 uL and auto-draw prevents under-fill errors.
Blood Glucose Monitors
In a 30-day, 60-patient accuracy study, 95 % of Sure Sync results fell within ±15 % of reference YSI values, meeting ISO 15197:2013. The meter delivered readings in 5 s from 0.8 uL blood and stored 1,000 results. Connectivity is limited to the On Call app, which showed occasional syncing delays on Android.
Blood Glucose Monitors
Verio Reflect achieved a 9.2 % MARD across 510 paired samplesrespectable but behind Oxilines 7.5 % and Contours 7.9 %. ColorSure and Blood Sugar Mentor features guided users on corrective actions and earned high satisfaction among newly diagnosed participants. However, limited measurement range (20600 mg/dL) and CR2032 battery reliance diminish competitiveness. Strip price of $0.79 for 25-count boxes notably exceeds Oxiline bulk pricing.
Blood Glucose Monitors
Guide posted a 9.8 % MARD and delivered sub-4-second readings, quickest in our lineup. The SmartPack vial and strip eject button reduced finger fumbling. Night testing was aided by a bright port light. However, coin-cell batteries and $0.52/strip pricing inflate lifetime cost. App integration with mySugr is solid but requires subscription for advanced coaching.
Our reviews combine real-world testing, clinical evidence analysis, and medical professional input to provide comprehensive evaluations you can trust.
ISO methodology and evidence-based evaluation criteria
Healthcare professionals validate our findings
Extended use periods for authentic insights
Create your own custom 1v1 comparison! Select any 2 devices from the same category to see detailed side-by-side performance, features, and clinical evidence.
