Fast measurement cycle and solid build, but accuracy and app lag behind leaders.
Welch Allyn Home 1700 Review: Clinical Heritage at Home
Using a simulator and human trials (25 participants, 300 readings) over 4 weeks, the 1700 Series achieved mean error 2.2 mmHg. SureBP captured pressures in 20 seconds, reducing cuff time. Bluetooth app sync required multiple pairing attempts on Android during testing.
Table of Contents
Clinical Summary
Clinical Performance Metrics
Quantitative assessment based on clinical testing protocols
Measurement Accuracy
Mean error 2.2 mmHg; slower inflation improved comfort but slightly less precise.
Cuff Fit & Comfort
Colour guide aided fit; stiff edge felt tight on small arms.
Ease of Use
Large button, backlit screen; pairing steps lengthy.
App
Basic logbook; lacks trend graphs; occasional disconnects.
Build Quality
Robust casing; survived drop test with minor scuffs.
Overall Value
Higher cost than Omron for similar precision; speed may justify for clinics.
Quick Take
Key findings from our clinical evaluation
+
Strengths
- Fast SureBP inflation
- Clinical-grade brand heritage
- Motion detection alert
- Backlit LCD
- Colour cuff fit guide
−
Limitations
- Less accurate than top performers
- App lacks analytics
- Higher price point
Real-World Usage
Practical considerations for daily operation
Daily Routine Impact
20-second measurement reduces arm compression time.
Learning Curve
Master in a day
Maintenance
Calibration check every 2 years recommended.
Portability
Bulkier power brick; fits large carry case.
Manual Use
All stats visible on screen; app not required.
Cost & Coverage Analysis
Financial considerations and HSA / FSA eligibility
Pricing Breakdown
HSA/FSA Guidance
Bulk ordering through clinics may secure coverage.
Cost Comparison
Most expensive in group but offers fastest cycle.
Patient Suitability
Clinical indications and contraindications
Indicated For
- • Clinics needing rapid throughput
- • Users prioritizing build durability
- • Households with multiple users
Contraindications
- • Budget shoppers
- • Small-arm users seeking gentler cuff
Age Considerations
Large backlit display supports older adults.
Clinical Efficacy Assessment
Evidence-based evaluation of clinical performance
Measurement Accuracy
Closeness of readings to true arterial pressure.
Within +/-3 mmHg on 90 % of tests.
Repeatability / Precision
Consistency across consecutive readings.
Intra-device SD 1.7 mmHg.
Cuff Accuracy Across Arm Sizes
Accuracy maintained on different arm sizes.
Under-reading 2.5 mmHg on <24 cm arms.
Arrhythmia Detection Sensitivity
Ability to flag irregular rhythms.
78 % AF detection on simulator.
Comparative Performance
Ranked #5 of 15 clinically evaluated blood pressure monitors devices
Oxiline Pressure XS Pro
Oxiline
Welch Allyn Home 1700 Series
Welch Allyn
You're viewing this
Welch Allyn Home 1700 Series You're viewing this device
Welch Allyn
Clinical Context
Our #1-ranked blood pressure monitors device demonstrated superior performance across key clinical metrics. Compare detailed specifications to make an evidence-based selection.
Clinical Recommendation
Final assessment and prescribing guidance
Welch Allyn 1700 offers hospital-speed measurements and sturdy design, but falls short on accuracy and smart features for its price.
Recommend If
You value fast inflation and brand pedigree over advanced app functions.
Avoid If
You need the highest accuracy or advanced analytics.
Clinical Summary
Composite Score
Recommendation
Price Point
Where to Buy
Verified purchase options and current availability
MarketLab
FSA/HSA eligible
Important Information
- • Prices and availability subject to change
- • Some devices may require a prescription
- • HSA / FSA eligibility: Usually Eligible
- • Purchase from authorized retailers for warranty protection
Alternative Devices
Fastest measurement but lowest accuracy in this cohort.
