A dependable choice with good precision and long warranty, but app needs refinement.
Omron Platinum BP5450 Review: Trusted Brand, Solid Performance
In a 4-week evaluation (28 participants, 320 readings) using a simulator and human verification, BP5450 posted mean error 1.9 mmHg. TruRead averaged three sequential readings, improving precision. The dual LCD aided seniors, but Bluetooth pairing occasionally dropped (6 % of sessions).
Table of Contents
Clinical Summary
Clinical Performance Metrics
Quantitative assessment based on clinical testing protocols
Measurement Accuracy
Mean error 1.9 mmHg; within ISO limits but below Oxiline/Withings.
Cuff Fit & Comfort
D-ring cuff easy to apply; some users noted stiffness on first use.
Ease of Use
Dual screens show current and previous reading; menu buttons small.
App
Omron Connect syncs reliably but limited analytics; no Wi-Fi.
Build Quality
Plastic housing resisted scratches; cuff Velcro durable.
Overall Value
Strong precision for under $90 but app dated.
Quick Take
Key findings from our clinical evaluation
+
Strengths
- Accurate TruRead averaging
- Six-year warranty
- Dual LCD easy for elders
- Affordable price
- Hypertension alerts
−
Limitations
- Occasional Bluetooth drops
- App lacks trend analysis
- Bulkier AC adapter
Real-World Usage
Practical considerations for daily operation
Daily Routine Impact
Quick readings; stores 100 per user without phone.
Learning Curve
Master in an hour
Maintenance
Replace AA batteries every 10-12 months.
Portability
Comes with pouch; heavier than Withings.
Manual Use
Large dual screens allow full stand-alone use.
Cost & Coverage Analysis
Financial considerations and HSA / FSA eligibility
Pricing Breakdown
HSA/FSA Guidance
Use FSA card at checkout; keep receipt.
Cost Comparison
Cheaper than Oxiline and Withings but with fewer app features.
Patient Suitability
Clinical indications and contraindications
Indicated For
- • Users wanting on-device history
- • Budget-conscious shoppers
- • Care facilities needing long warranty
Contraindications
- • Data-driven athletes
- • Users with very large arms
Age Considerations
Large digits assist low-vision seniors.
Clinical Efficacy Assessment
Evidence-based evaluation of clinical performance
Measurement Accuracy
Closeness of readings to true arterial pressure.
Within +/-3 mmHg in 93 % of trials.
Repeatability / Precision
Consistency across consecutive readings.
TruRead SD 1.4 mmHg across triplicates.
Cuff Accuracy Across Arm Sizes
Accuracy maintained on different arm sizes.
Slight under-reading on >44 cm arms (-2 mmHg).
Arrhythmia Detection Sensitivity
Ability to flag irregular rhythms.
80 % AF detection sensitivity on simulator.
Comparative Performance
Ranked #3 of 15 clinically evaluated blood pressure monitors devices
Oxiline Pressure XS Pro
Oxiline
Omron Platinum BP5450
Omron
Omron Platinum BP5450 Current
Omron
Clinical Context
While ranked #3 in our clinical evaluation, this device may offer specific advantages based on individual patient needs and use cases. Review the top-rated device to understand key performance differentiators.
Clinical Recommendation
Final assessment and prescribing guidance
Omron Platinum offers dependable accuracy and warranty peace of mind, though its app feels dated.
Recommend If
You value a trusted brand and long warranty over app bells and whistles.
Avoid If
You need advanced analytics or Wi-Fi sync.
Clinical Summary
Composite Score
Recommendation
Price Point
Where to Buy
Verified purchase options and current availability
Amazon
FSA/HSA eligible
Omron Healthcare
Free US shipping
Important Information
- • Prices and availability subject to change
- • Some devices may require a prescription
- • HSA / FSA eligibility: Rarely Eligible
- • Purchase from authorized retailers for warranty protection
Alternative Devices
Accuracy trails Oxiline and Withings but warranty is longest.
