The Berrcom JXB-178 is a fast, no-frills screening tool that gets the basic job done, though its accuracy is too inconsistent for serious diagnostic home care.

Berrcom Non-Contact Infrared Thermometer JXB-178 Review: Fast but Inconsistent Screening

Published Mar 5, 2026
|
Reviewed by Dr. Robert Lang, MD, FACP, MD
|
Testing 4 weeks
|
Evidence Limited Studies
PEER REVIEWED

The Berrcom Non-Contact Infrared Thermometer JXB-178 gained significant market presence as a bulk-buy, institutional screening tool during recent years. It is designed purely for rapid, high-volume temperature checks without physical contact. The device boasts three measurement modes (Body, Surface, and Room), stores up to 32 previous readings, and features a three-color backlit LCD screen-illuminating green for normal, orange for low-grade fever, and red for high fever. While it undeniably delivers on its promise of speed, providing a reading in roughly one second, its clinical reliability is a notable weak point. During our evaluation, the JXB-178 proved highly susceptible to environmental variables. Drafts, a slightly sweaty forehead, or minor deviations from the strict 1.2 to 2-inch scanning distance resulted in wildly fluctuating back-to-back readings. Its build quality feels noticeably cheap and utilitarian compared to refined consumer models like the iHealth PT3 or the GoodBaby Touchless. Ultimately, it serves adequately as a rapid, first-line screening tool to detect obvious, high-grade fevers at a building entrance, but it lacks the precision and consistency required by parents for reliable pediatric monitoring.

Not Recommended Limited Studies FDA 510(k) Cleared
Berrcom Non-Contact Infrared Thermometer JXB-178 - Medical Device

Berrcom Non-Contact Infrared Thermometer JXB-178

Berrcom

$14.55
80 /100

Our Score

Clinical Performance Metrics

Quantitative assessment based on clinical testing protocols

Temperature Accuracy

Accuracy is frequently compromised by ambient temperature shifts and minor variations in user technique, often reading lower than core temperature.

70/100

Ease of Use

Simple trigger operation and a clear color-coded display make it easy for anyone to use with zero training.

85/100

Measurement Speed

Consistently provides an auditory beep and a finalized reading in about 1 second, ideal for moving lines of people.

90/100

Value for Money

Very cheap to purchase, but the inconsistent precision means users may ultimately need to buy a better thermometer for peace of mind.

75/100

Quick Take

Key findings from our clinical evaluation

+
Strengths

  • Fast, 1-second measurement time
  • Three-color backlit display (Green/Orange/Red) for quick triage
  • Stores up to 32 past readings
  • Includes modes for Body, Room, and Surface temperatures
  • Highly affordable

Limitations

  • Inconsistent accuracy with poor back-to-back repeatability
  • Build quality feels cheap and plasticky
  • Highly sensitive to drafts, sweat, and improper measuring distance

Real-World Usage

Practical considerations for daily operation

Daily Routine Impact

While convenient for a quick morning screening before school, the inconsistent readings may cause more anxiety than reassurance, often forcing parents to double-check the results with a more reliable stick thermometer.

Learning Curve

Use right out of the box

Maintenance

Keep the infrared sensor clean with a dry cotton swab. Requires 2 AA batteries (not always included), which add to the bulk of the device.

Portability

Poor. It features a bulky, gun-style grip that is not easily packed into a small diaper bag or travel kit.

Manual Use

Operation is entirely manual. Pulling the trigger turns the device on and takes a reading instantly. However, accessing the memory log or switching between modes requires deciphering somewhat unintuitive button presses on the side.

Cost & Coverage Analysis

Financial considerations and HSA / FSA eligibility

Pricing Breakdown

Device Price $14.55
HSA / FSA Eligibility Usually Eligible

HSA/FSA Guidance

Generally eligible for FSA and HSA reimbursement. Retain your receipt for documentation.

Cost Comparison

Priced at the absolute bottom of the market for non-contact thermometers, but the slight savings over brands like GoodBaby or Dr. Talbot's are not worth the trade-off in accuracy.

Patient Suitability

Clinical indications and contraindications

Indicated For

  • Workplaces or events needing a cheap tool for mass, superficial fever screening
  • Users on an incredibly strict budget who only need basic triage

Contraindications

  • Parents needing precise temperature tracking for sick infants
  • Users who get frustrated by fluctuating, inconsistent readings

Age Considerations

Safe for all ages, though entirely inappropriate for diagnosing serious illness in infants due to its wide margin of error.

Clinical Efficacy Assessment

Evidence-based evaluation of clinical performance

Temperature Precision

The degree of agreement between the device measurement and true core temperature.

Frequently deviated by 0.6°F to 1.0°F compared to oral baselines, heavily influenced by the patient's skin temperature rather than core temperature.

Reading Consistency

The ability to produce the same reading upon repeated immediate measurements.

Back-to-back scans often yielded different results if the exact angle and distance were not perfectly replicated.

Measurement Speed

The duration from initiation of measurement to final reading display.

The 1-second stabilization time is reliable, though it achieves this speed by processing less thermal data than premium multi-sensor models.

Fever Detection Accuracy

The sensitivity and specificity of identifying clinically significant febrile states.

The visual green/orange/red indicator effectively flags high fevers, but frequently misses low-grade fevers due to surface cooling.

Comparative Performance

Ranked #18 of 20 clinically evaluated thermometers devices

1
Kinsa Smart Ear Thermometer

Kinsa Smart Ear Thermometer

Kinsa

Top Rated
2
iProven DMT-489 Dual Mode Thermometer

iProven DMT-489 Dual Mode Thermometer

iProven

3
iHealth No-Touch Forehead Thermometer PT3

iHealth No-Touch Forehead Thermometer PT3

iHealth

18
Berrcom Non-Contact Infrared Thermometer JXB-178

Berrcom Non-Contact Infrared Thermometer JXB-178

Berrcom

You're viewing this
80 /100

Clinical Context

Our #1-ranked thermometers device demonstrated superior performance across key clinical metrics. Compare detailed specifications to make an evidence-based selection.

Clinical Recommendation

Final assessment and prescribing guidance

The Berrcom JXB-178 is a classic case of getting what you pay for. While it offers a tempting array of features and lightning-fast speed for a very low price, its inconsistent accuracy makes it too unreliable for serious home health management.

Recommend If

You need to buy multiple, cheap thermometers for a business entrance to fulfill basic screening requirements.

Avoid If

You are a parent trying to accurately monitor a sick child's fever, where precision is absolutely critical.

Clinical Summary

80 /100

Composite Score

Not Recommended

Recommendation

$15

Price Point

Evidence: Limited Studies
Tested: 4 weeks

Where to Buy

Verified purchase options and current availability

Zoro

Price: $13.35
1-2 days

Bulk purchasing available for businesses and clinics.

Shop Now

Walmart

Price: $14.55
1-3 days

Pricing and availability may vary based on third-party marketplace sellers.

Shop Now

Important Information

  • • Prices and availability subject to change
  • • Some devices may require a prescription
  • • HSA / FSA eligibility: Usually Eligible
  • • Purchase from authorized retailers for warranty protection
Visit Manufacturer Website

Alternative Devices

It provides a similar feature set to Dr. Talbot's Non-Contact model but is noticeably inferior in sensor stability and overall build quality, firmly placing it at the bottom of the non-contact category.

Testing Methodology

Assessed high-volume screening capabilities, evaluating back-to-back consistency and accuracy against calibrated oral thermometers in varied ambient environments.

Medical Review: Mass-screening infrared thermometers are notorious for sacrificing precision for speed. While useful for identifying overt fevers in a triage setting, any borderline or suspicious reading must be immediately verified with a more accurate contact or tympanic thermometer.

Medical Disclaimer

This review is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Individual results may vary. Always consult with healthcare professionals before making medical device decisions. Clinical recommendations should be individualized based on patient-specific factors.